👋

Welcome

Week 1

The Junk Drawer

Don't we all have a junk drawer in the kitchen? Full of spare parts, mystery cables, and bits and pieces we've been saving for that one day we might need them.

Well, this is that day.

This week we're having a good old rummage. Everything you've picked up about AI, the bits you've half tried, the things you've heard, the stuff you've been meaning to look into — it all counts. Let's see what you're actually working with.

This week is about finding out what's already in your drawer.

🎬

This Week's Concept Drop

🤸

Your Weekly Experiment

This week, you're going to use AI to challenge your expertise. Not because AI is smarter than you (it's not). But because the act of inviting challenge (instead of seeking confirmation) is how you practice the learning mode.

Pick one specific topic within your domain where you feel confident. Not 'my whole job', something specific. Like how you plan a roster, write a safety report, schedule a maintenance run, draft a project update, or structure a campaign. You need to feel like you're in knowing mode to practice switching to learning mode.

Then, ask AI to show you what you're missing.

Choose your track:

🧑‍💼

Hands-On Track

Your Experiment:

Pick one specific topic within your domain where you consider yourself experienced. Use an AI tool (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, etc.) to ask it to challenge your thinking.

Choose one of these three prompt templates:

Template A: Surface Blind Spots

"I've been working in [specific domain] for [X years]. I believe that [specific assumption or approach you hold]. What am I missing? What would someone from [different discipline: psychology, economics, design, etc.] notice about this that I might not see?"

Template B: Invite Challenge

"Here's how I currently approach [specific task or problem]: [describe your approach in 2-3 sentences]. What are the weaknesses in this approach? What could go wrong that I'm not anticipating?"

Template C: Explore Alternatives

"I typically solve [specific problem] by doing [your usual method]. What are three completely different ways to approach this that I probably haven't considered?"

Success looks like: You feel slightly uncomfortable. The AI surfaces something that makes you think "Huh, I hadn't considered that" or "I disagree with that, but I can't immediately explain why."
This is NOT about: Getting the "right" answer from AI. It's about practicing the learning mode: inviting challenge instead of seeking confirmation.
👔

Team Lead Track

Your Experiment:

Pick one specific challenge your team is currently facing. Not "we need to be more innovative", something like "we're deciding whether to rebuild our legacy system or patch it."

Use an AI tool to generate questions that expand how you're thinking about the problem.

Choose one of these two prompt templates:

Template A: Question Generation

"My team is facing this challenge: [describe in 2-3 sentences]. I've been focused on [the aspect you're currently focused on]. What questions should I be asking that I'm probably not asking? What am I not considering?"

Template B: Assumption Testing

"Here's a decision my team needs to make: [describe the decision]. Here are the assumptions I'm making: [list 2-3 assumptions]. What assumptions am I making that I haven't named? What would need to be true for this decision to backfire?"

Success looks like: AI generates at least 2-3 questions that make you pause and think "I should actually ask the team that" or "I've been avoiding that question."
This is NOT about: Getting AI to solve your team's problem. It's about using AI to expand your problem space before you narrow it.
💡 Psst, need help?

If AI output feels unhelpful, try these:

😑 Response is generic
Ask for specificity: "Give me a concrete example." Add more context about your specific situation. Try changing the lens: "What would a [psychologist/designer] say?"
Response is wrong
Ask why: "Why did you interpret it that way?" Clarify your intent: "Let me rephrase..." Identify the gap: "What info would you need?"
🛡️ You disagree
Good. That's the point. Write down why you disagree. Ask yourself: "What would I need to believe for this to be true?" Disagreement is data.
🤔 AI asks questions instead
Answer the questions. The AI is showing you what's missing from your prompt. Use them as follow-up: "Good question. Here's my answer: [respond]. Now what am I missing?"
😰 Feels like wasting time
That discomfort is the point. You're building a new muscle. Commit to at least 3 rounds. The learning happens in rounds 2 and 3, not round 1.
🔁 Still generic after refining
Add specific constraints: your industry, your limitations. Ask the AI: "Why is your output generic? What context am I not providing?" Try a different AI tool.

⚡ Quick tips

Start specific. Refine, don't restart. Use disagreement as data. Ask meta-questions: "Why did you interpret it that way?"

🧠

Time to Reflect with Eko

After you complete your experiment, it's time to process what happened. This is where the learning actually sticks.

🤖

Chat with Eko

Your AI reflection coach

💡 Pro tip: Start your reflection with this prompt:

"Eko, I just completed my Week 1 experiment for the AI Starter Sprint. I practiced the learning mode by asking AI to challenge my thinking. Can you help me reflect on what I noticed?"

Important: Eko isn't here to tell you what to think. Eko is here to help you think. If a question doesn't land, say so. If you need to go deeper on something, ask.
🤓

The Deep Dive

Not required, for those who want to go deeper.

1

"Fixed vs. Growth Mindset" by Carol Dweck

20-min TEDx Video

Dweck's research on mindsets is the psychological foundation for the "knowing vs. learning" distinction. Focus on how praising intelligence creates rigidity, while praising effort creates curiosity.

▶️ Watch on YouTube →
2

"The Dunning-Kruger Effect" by Veritasium

8-min YouTube Video

The real danger isn't the beginner who thinks they're an expert. It's the expert who stops questioning their expertise. This one will make you think about where you might be sitting at "peak confidence."

▶️ Watch on YouTube →
3

"How Experts Differ from Novices" by MIT

Article + Video

Expertise creates efficiency but also blindness. You stop seeing what beginners see. This piece explores how that happens, and this week is about recovering that sight.

📄 Read the Article →
← Back to Sprint Home Next: Week 2 →